Assessing the Effects of Tax Elasticity on Government Spending

  • Debasis Patnaik
  • Venkat Yaji
Keywords: Tax Elasticity, Tax Revenue, Govt. Expenditure, OLS Regression, GDP, Central Assistance


This paper assesses the effects of Tax elasticity on Government Spending state wise from 2001-2010 for five major states in terms of population. OLS Regression model is used where the relationships are assumed to be linear. The variables used in the regression model are: Gt = the government spending at the state level, the dependent variable Yt = the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the state Ct = the central assistance to the state , Et = the elasticity variable, The subscript ‘t’ refers to the corresponding year of analysis and b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5 are regression coefficients. In most of the cases, elasticity bore a positive and significant relation to the level of government spending except in the case of Bihar, where the coefficient was negative and insignificant.


[1] Eleanor D. Craig & A. James Heins. (1980). The effect of tax elasticity on government spending. Journal of Public Choice, 35(3), 267-275.
[2] Fauzia Mukkaram. (2001). Elasticity and buoyancy of major taxes in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 39(1), 75-86
[3] Ankita Gupta. (2009). The trends and responsiveness of personal income tax in India. Fourth Annual International Conference on Public Policy and Management, IGIDR Proceedings-Project Reports Series, 062-29. Available at:
[4] Brima Ibrahim Baimba Kargbo, & Festus O. Egwaikhide. (2012). Tax elasticity in sierra leone: A time series approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(4), 432-447.
[5] Guido Wolswijk. (2007), Short- and long-run tax elasticities: The case of the Netherlands. European Central Bank, No. 273. Available at:
[7] Website of the ministry of Finance (For tax Revenues). Available at:
How to Cite
Debasis Patnaik, & Venkat Yaji. (2018). Assessing the Effects of Tax Elasticity on Government Spending. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(5), 70-76. Retrieved from