Organizational Effectiveness of Naval State University: Proposed Institutional Capacity Building
This research sought to study the organizational effectiveness of Naval State University (NSU), Biliran, Philippines. It was intended to answer the organizational effectiveness of the delivery of service by the present academic organizational set-up in terms of: Instruction, Research, and Community Extension. The study used the descriptive survey method through the aid of focus group discussion and researcher-made guided questions as the main instrument for data collection. There were items in the instrument that were patterned from the accreditation activities by the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines (AACUP). The researcher tapped a third party who was an expert in conducting focus group discussions. The expert researcher who conducted the FGD was not connected with the Naval State University to avoid any biases. The activity of FGD was recorded with the consent of the key informants. The key informants were the key officials of the university. And they come up with only one answer in each item or indicator. The data were recorded according to the frequencies and corresponding percentage. After analyzing and interpreting the processed data, the Organizational Effectiveness of NSU in the areas of: Instruction, Research and Community Extension were rated as very effective. But some indicators were identified for needed improvements. And the institutional capacity building as designed in the study should be implemented accordingly.
 Andres, Tomas Q. (1998). Community development: A manual. Manila: New Daw Publishers.
 Bush, Tony. (2011). Theory of educational leadership and management. (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publication.
 CHED CMO No. 08 Series of 2010. (2010). Revised guidelines for the outstanding higher education institution (HEI) extension program award. Available at: https://ched.gov.ph/cmo-8-s-2010/.
 CHED CMO No. 23 Series of 2013. (2013). Reformulated guidelines for the CHED research and publication (Republica) awards. Available at: https://ched.gov.ph/cmo-23-s-2013/.
 CHED CMO No. 46, Series of 2012. (2012). Policy-standard to enhance quality assurance (QA) in Philippines higher education through an outcomes-based and typology-based QA. Available at: https://ched.gov.ph/cmo-46-s-2012/.
 Fairweather, James S. (1989). Academic research and instruction: The industrial connection. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(4), 388-407.
 Gardner, Susan & Eng, Susanna. (2003). What students want: Generation Y and the changing function of the academic library. Available at: www.muse.jhu.edu.
 Glickman, Carl D. et al. (2009). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. (2nd ed.). USA: Pearson.
 Hair, Joseph et al. (2007). Research methods for business. UK: John Wiley and Sons.
 Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Images of organization. SAGE Publication, Inc. USA.
 Nonaka, Ikujero & Takeuchi, Hirotaka. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Office of State Personnel. Organizational Effectiveness Model. North Carolina. (2015). Organizational effectiveness model. Available at: Monster.com.
 Paulson, Karen. (2002). Reconfiguring faculty roles for virtual settings. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 123-140.
 Perin, Dolores. (1998). Curriculum and pedagogy to integrate occupational and academic instruction in the college: Implications for faculty development. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428793.pdf.
 Robbins, Stephen P. & Coulter, Mary. (2002). Management. (7th ed.). USA: Prentice Hall.
 Sekaran, Uma & Bougie, Roger. (2010). Research methods for business. A skill building approach. UK: John Wiley and Sons.
 Srikanthan & Dalrymple. (2002). Developing a holistic model for quality in higher education. Available at: www.tandfoline.com.
 Starratt, Robert. (2011). Refocusing school leadership. USA: Routledge.
 Tomada, Giovanna et. al. (2005). Friendship as a predictor of adjustment following a transition and evaluation. Available at: www.tnadfonline.com.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.