Assessing the Effects of Tax Elasticity on Government Spending

  • Debasis Patnaik
  • Venkat Yaji
Keywords: Tax Elasticity, Tax Revenue, Govt. Expenditure, OLS Regression, GDP, Central Assistance


This paper assesses the effects of Tax elasticity on Government Spending state wise from 2001-2010 for five major states in terms of population. OLS Regression model is used where the relationships are assumed to be linear. The variables used in the regression model are: Gt = the government spending at the state level, the dependent variable Yt = the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the state Ct = the central assistance to the state , Et = the elasticity variable, The subscript ‘t’ refers to the corresponding year of analysis and b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5 are regression coefficients. In most of the cases, elasticity bore a positive and significant relation to the level of government spending except in the case of Bihar, where the coefficient was negative and insignificant.


Download data is not yet available.


Eleanor D. Craig & A. James Heins. (1980). The effect of tax elasticity on government spending. Journal of Public Choice, 35(3), 267-275.

Fauzia Mukkaram. (2001). Elasticity and buoyancy of major taxes in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 39(1), 75-86

Ankita Gupta. (2009). The trends and responsiveness of personal income tax in India. Fourth Annual International Conference on Public Policy and Management, IGIDR Proceedings-Project Reports Series, 062-29. Available at:

Brima Ibrahim Baimba Kargbo, & Festus O. Egwaikhide. (2012). Tax elasticity in sierra leone: A time series approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(4), 432-447.

Guido Wolswijk. (2007), Short- and long-run tax elasticities: The case of the Netherlands. European Central Bank, No. 273. Available at:

Website of the ministry of Finance (For tax Revenues). Available at:

How to Cite
Debasis Patnaik, & Venkat Yaji. (2018). Assessing the Effects of Tax Elasticity on Government Spending. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(5), 70-76.