Mapping the Metrics of Radiology Technology Diffusion: A Case for Swaziland

  • Mitchel S Danisa
  • Lidion Sibanda
Keywords: Technology Diffusion, Technology Acceptance, Technology Utilisation, Medical Imaging


In recent years Swaziland’s medical field has been graced by computerised data collecting systems and the installation of computer work stations in most health care facilities. This was in response to the invention of new and improved imaging technologies in high income countries. Establishing the impact of this development requires investigation of predictor variables such as perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and the technology diffusion pattern as it varies from one country to another. In this complex landscape, the objective of this study was to establish how these predictor variables modelled technology diffusion in Swaziland. Data collection involved both passive and active data sources using questionnaires, interviews and observations in a complemental manner. An 83% response rate was obtained from the study. The results revealed that technology diffusion in Swaziland was currently at its peak modelled mainly by the perceived ease of use and the perceived usefulness of the new technologies. The peak of the diffusion of technology was in the second decade of the 21st century with the most advanced technologies being in the private sector. A more extensive study to cover imaging centres excluded from this study is recommended. An investigation into technology diffusion extending to interventional radiology practices, role extension for radiographers and funding models may support improved technology diffusion mechanisms.


Download data is not yet available.


Boote, N.D. & Beile, P. (2005). Scholors before researchers: On the centrality ofthe dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Bower, G. (2005). The difussion and value of healthcare information technology. Pittsburg: The RAND Coperation. Available at:

Bushong, S. (2013). Radiologic science for technologists. (10th ed.). Taxis: Elsevier.

Comin, D. & Hobijn, B. (2008). An exploration of Technology difusion. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2031-2059.

Cowen, J. (2009). The influence of percieved usefulness,ease of use and subjective normin the use of computed radiography systems. Ohio: Radiologic Science and Therapy Department. Available at:;jsessionid=1732BA6A77FC019CCF162429C1D7C4A7?sequence=1

Darzi, T. & Parston, G. (2013). Global diffusion of health innovation. London: World Innovation Summit of health. Available at:

Glenn, M. & Hackbarth, J. (2004). New Approaches in Medicine. Washington DC: Medpac.

Kowalczyk, N. (1984). The importance of motivating radiology department employess. Available at:

Maree, K. (2016). First steps in research. (2nd ed.). Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Murtagh, J. and Foerster, V. (2009). Managing technology diffusion. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Helath. Available at:

Oshlyansky, L., P, C. and H, T. (2007). Validating the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology tool cross culturally. Swansea, University of Wales Swansea. Available at:

Phichitchaisopa, N. & Naenna, T. (2013). Factors affeting the adoptation f health care information technology. Thailnd, Mahidol University. Available at:

Davis N. (2007). Health information technology. (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier.

Taiwo, A. & Downe, A.G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology: A meta analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical and applied information technology, 49(1), 48-58.

Van Bemmel J. & Musen M. (1997). Handbook of medical informatics. New York: Springer.

How to Cite
Mitchel S Danisa, & Lidion Sibanda. (2018). Mapping the Metrics of Radiology Technology Diffusion: A Case for Swaziland. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(3), 90-99.