Harmony Search Algorithmic Rule for Optimum Allocation and Size of Distributed Generation
Various benefits earned by desegregation Distributed Generation (DG) in distribution systems. Such advantages are often achieved and increased if DGs area unit optimally sized and placed within the systems. The current work presents distribution generation (DG) allocation strategy with objective of up node voltage and minimizes power loss of radial distribution systems victimization improved multi objective harmony search algorithmic program (IMOHS).IMOHS algorithmic program uses sensitivity analysis for distinctive the optimum locations of distribution generation units, the successively reduces the real power loss and improves the voltage profile in distribution system. The target is to scale back active power losses to minimum, whereas to attain voltage profiles within the network in needed and determined limit. Within the gift work the optimum decigram placement and size drawback is developed as a multi-objective improvement drawback to attain the above mentioned situation.
An IEEE 33-node and IEEE 69-node radial distribution check systems are wont to show the effectiveness of the Improved multi objective Harmony Search rule (IMOHS). The results obtained from the IMOHS methodology shows that vital loss reduction is feasible mistreatment multiple optimum sized decigram units. It’s shown that the IMOHS methodology provides higher ends up in comparisons thereto obtained mistreatment alternative optimization ways like GA and PSO.
Dugan, T. & McDermott. (2002). Distributed generation. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 8(2), 19-25.
C. Masters. (2002). Voltage rise: The big issue when connecting embedded generation to long 11kV overhead lines. Power Engineering Journal, 16(1), 5–12.
N. Acharya, P. Mahat, & N. Mithulananthan. (2006). An analytical approach forDG allocation in primary distribution network. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 28(10), 669–678.
T. Ackermann, G. Andersson, & L. Soder. (2001). Distributed generation: A definition. Electric Power Systems Research, 57(3), 195-204.
C.J. Dent, L.F. Ochoa, & G.P. Harrison. (2010). Network distribution capacity analysis using OPF with voltage step constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(1), 296–304.
Z. W. Geem, J. H. Kim, & G. V. Loganathan. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60–68.
S. Sivasubramani & K. S. Swarup. (2011). Environmental/economic dispatchusing multi-objective harmony search algorithm. Electrical and Power Systems Research, 81, 1778–1785.
B. Huang, B. Buckley, & T.-M. Kechadi. (2010). Multi-objective feature selection by using NSGA-II for customer churn prediction in telecommunications. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3638–3646.
P. Carvalho, P. Correia, & L. Ferreira. (2008). Distributed reactive power generation control for voltage rise mitigation in distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23(2), 766–772.
Komail Nekooei, Malihe M. Farsangi, Hossein Nezamabadi-Pour, & Kwang Y. Lee. (2013 Mar). An improved multi-objective harmony search for optimal placement of DGs in distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(1), 557-567.
Z. Bo & C. Yi-jia. (2005). Multiple objective particle swarm optimization technique for economic load dispatch. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 6(5), 420-427.
M. H. Moradi & M. Abedinie. (2010). A combination of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for optimal DG sitting and sizing in distribution systems. In Proc. International Power Energy Conference, pp. 858–862.
F. S. Abu-Mouti & M. E. El-Hawary. (2011). Heuristic curve-fitted technique for distributed generation optimisation in radial distribution feeder systems. Generation, Transmission & Distribution, IET, 5(2), 172-180.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.