Reasons for Delaying the Constriction Projects in Iraq

  • Areej A. Alsaadi M.Sc. Student, Department of Engineering Management, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Gedik University, TURKEY
  • Redvan Ghasemlounia Assisstant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Gedik University, TURKEY
Keywords: Academic Qualification, Government Agencies, Social Sciences for Packet Statistical Test, Payment of Financial Dues, Project Budget, Project Risk Management

Abstract

This article dealt with construction projects in Iraq, and the research focused on the risks that may affect these projects. The purpose of this study is to determine the risks that construction projects are exposed to in Iraq and the methods of dealing in order to reduce these risks. Sometimes, if the construction projects are similar to each other in terms of configuration, requirements and purpose, then changing the project site is very sufficient to make these projects differ from each other and thus may be exposed to different risks. These are risks that negatively affect the implementation of these projects and may lead to delay or increase in their cost. Here a questionnaire is designed to collect data to identify risks that may occur during the construction project phases. This questionnaire was distributed electronically to several samples in the public and private sectors within state institutions in Iraq. After completion, the risks that these projects may be exposed to were identified. This was done with engineers and managers of companies and projects working in the public, private and joint sectors, and then these risks were analyzed by the Social Sciences for Packet Statistical Test program(SPSS).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59-82.

Maurya, A. K., Yadav, R. K., Singh, A. K., Deep, A., & Yadav, V. (2020). Studies on correlation and path coefficients analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(4), 524-527.

Dybjer, P. & Colloquium, B. L. (2010). Program testing and constructive validity.

Schaefer, K. A., Wu, W. H., Colgan, D. F., Tsang, S. H., Bassuk, A. G., & Mahajan, V. B. (2017). Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo. Nature Methods, 14(6), 547.

Hillson, D. (2003). Effective opportunity management for projects: Exploiting positive risk. CRC Press.

Raz, T., & Michael, E. (2001). Use and benefits of tools for project risk management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 9-17.

Elbeltagi, E. & Eng, P. (2009). Lecture notes on construction project management. Mansoura University, Egypt.

Zou, P. X., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. Y. (2006, Jan). Identifying key risks in construction projects: life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. In: Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference.

Oberlender, G. D. (2014). Project management for engineering and construction. McGraw-Hill Education.

Koulafetis, P. (2017). Modern credit risk management: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Published
2021-02-27
How to Cite
Areej A. Alsaadi, & Redvan Ghasemlounia. (2021). Reasons for Delaying the Constriction Projects in Iraq. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 11(1), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.11.1.18