The Automation of Critical Path Method using Machine Learning: A Conceptual Study
This research aims to shed light on the use of machine learning in improving, developing and automating the critical path method, solving its problems, studying this effect and its dimensions, and discussing that from many aspects.
The research is divided into two theoretical and practical parts. The theoretical part is concerned with studying the critical path method and its advantages, problems and challenges, as well as studying machine learning and artificial intelligence and its dimensions, reviewing materials and sources related to this, and then presenting suggestions and future solutions based on this study. As for the practical section, it is a questionnaire that targeted a segment of engineers, in particular, and others who have sufficient experience in both the critical path method and machine learning, and seeking their opinions on both topics.
The result of the theoretical research was 14 theories or proposals that were presented based on the foregoing study. As for the practical questionnaire, a sample of 127 was taken. Through statistical analysis, the results were analyzed and discussed separately, and then a conclusion was drawn regarding them.
Jayawardena A. K. W. (2012). Mitigating delays in donor funded projects in Sri Lanka. Engineer-Journal of Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka, XXXV(01), 65-75.
Lisa, T. (2017). An introduction to machine learning. Digital Ocean Community, 1-3.
Liberatore, M. J., Pollack-Johnson, B., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Project management in construction: Software use and research directions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 127, 101–107.
Ahuja, V. & Thiruvengadam, V. (2004). Project scheduling and monitoring: current research status. Construction Innovation, 4, 19-31.
Halphin, D.W. & Woodhead, R.W. (1998). Construction management. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Russell, J. S. & Radtke, M. W. (1991). Subcontractor failure. Case history. AACE International Transactions, E.02.1-E.02.6.
Baweja, S. S. (2006). CPM schedules -Why and how. AACE International Transactions, PS.22.1-PS.22.5.
Kelleher, A. (2004). An investigation of the expanding role of the critical path method by ENR’s top 400 contractors. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Hawkins, C. V. (2007). Assessing CPM scheduling software for the small to mid-size construction firm. Master’s thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Galloway, P. D. (2006). Survey of the construction industry relative to the use of CPM scheduling for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 132, 697–711.
Warren S. McCulloch & Walter Pitts. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5, 115–133.
A. M. Turing. (1950). I.—Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.
Oliver S. & Marvin M. (1955). Self-Pattern recognition and modern computers. In: Western Joint Computer Conference, pp. 91–93.
Marvin M., John McCarthy, Nathan R., & Claude S. (1955). A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence.
Marvin Minsky & Seymour Papert. (1972). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. (2nd ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press,
McCarthy, John. (1959). Letter to the editor. Communications of the ACM, 2(8).
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1976). Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Paul J. Werbos. (1979). Neural networks for control.
David E. Rumelhart, Geoffrey E. Hinton, & Ronald J. Williams. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/323533a0.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.