Contributions of Productivity and Relative Price Changes to Wheat Profitability Changes in China

  • Li Xiu-Shuang College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 31130, CHINA
  • Irfan Mir Chohan School of Management, Jiangsu University, CHINA
  • Yu Kang Research Academy for Rural Revitalization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 31130, CHINA
Keywords: Profitability, Total Factor Productivity, Relative Price Change, Färe-Primont Index, Data Envelopment Analysis


Using the provincial panel data of wheat from 1998 to 2018, based on the total price and quantity framework proposed by O'Donnell(2010), and using Färe-Primont productivity index, this artical decomposes the change of wheat profitability into the change of input-output relative price (TT) and the change of total factor productivity (TFP), and further decomposes the change of TFP into technological progress and efficiency change based on input orientation. The results showed that the overall profitability of wheat decreased by 24.9% compared with 1998, which was attributed to the decrease of TT by 32.6% and the increase of TFP by 11.4%. Results indicate that profitability change is mainly driven by TT change, and the impact of TT change on wheat profitability was alleviated by the compensatory change of TFP. The main driving factor of wheat TFP growth is technical progress, Compared with the growth of technical progress, the technical efficiency grows slowly.


Download data is not yet available.


Chen Xiwen. (2013). Building a new agricultural management system and speeding up the development of modern agriculture. Economic Research, 48(02), 4-6.

Chen Xiwen. (2012). Several main problems of agricultural modernization with Chinese characteristics. Reform, 10, 5-8.

Li Wenfu, Zhang Minzhong, & Wang Yuanhui. (2015). Measuring and decomposing the changes of productivity and profitability of Taiwan Province banking industry. Economic Research, 51(02).

Mugera, A., M.R. Langemeier., & A.M.Featherstone. (2012). Labor productivity growth in the kansas farm sector: A tripartite decomposition using non-parametric approach. Agriculture and Resource Economics Review, 41, 298–312.

O’DONNELL C J. Measuring and decomposing agricultural productivity and profitability change. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4): 527-60.

O'DONNELL C J. (2012). Nonparametric estimates of the components of productivity and profitability change in U.S. agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(4).

Wang Li & Han Yali. (2016). An empirical analysis of China's cotton TFP growth-based on stochastic frontier analysis. Agricultural Technology and Economy, 11, 95-105.

Wu Fangwei & Kang Jiaojiao. (2020). Agricultural subsidy, relative price of factors and farmland circulation. Financial Research, 46(05), 81-93.

Yeager, E.A. & M.R. Langemeier. (2011). Productivity divergence across kansas farms. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 40, 282–292.

Yu Hailong & Li Binglong. (2012). Analysis of total factor productivity and its influencing factors in china dairy-based on DEA-Tobit model. Journal of Xi 'an University of Finance and Economics, 25(05), 33-38.

Zhang Haixia & Han Peijun. (2018). Measurement and convergence analysis of agricultural total factor productivity-based on Hicks-Moorsteen index. Rural Economy, 06, 55-61.

Zhao Liang & Yu Kang. (2019). Factor input structure and the growth of total factor productivity of grain in major producing areas — Based on the input-output panel data of major producing areas from 1978 to 2017. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 20(05), 8-13.

Zhou Zhizhuan. (2014). Study on the spatio-temporal characteristics of China's agricultural productivity-a nonparametric measurement framework based on sequential DEA. Hubei Social Sciences, 02, 78-83.

How to Cite
Li Xiu-Shuang, Irfan Mir Chohan, & Yu Kang. (2021). Contributions of Productivity and Relative Price Changes to Wheat Profitability Changes in China. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 11(4), 263-272.