Undergraduate Student’s Perspectives on E-learning during COVID-19 Outbreak in Sri Lankan Universities
As education moves e-learning all over the world due to COIVD-19 pandemic, students spend more time on e-learning than ever before. This is also equally applied to the Sri Lankan education system. Thus this study examines the undergraduate students’ perspectives on e-learning during the COVID-19 outbreak in universities in Sri Lanka. Primary data was obtained from undergraduate students in Sri Lankan university using a structured questionnaire via Google form. The perspectives on e-learning education during the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated using descriptive statistics and frequency analysis. The majority of the undergraduate students felt that the e-learning version of education saved travel time and cost of accommodation. Furthermore, the study revealed that the majority of students were happy with the e-learning form of education during the pandemic since it allowed them to finish their degrees faster and access the labor market without a delay. The biggest challenges with e-learning, according to the student responses, were internet access, device availability, visionary issues, technical issues, and stress. As a result of this COVID -19 pandemic, if higher education officials in Sri Lankan universities want to keep e-learning education on going, they must focus on offering cost-effective, high-speed data connections while minimizing technological hurdles. At the same time, it is important to update and revise the curriculum content according to this new mode of education since this is a completely new situation for all. There is relatively little research on students’ perspectives on e-learning education during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Sri Lankan context and it will provide some important highlights to the researchers, parent and academics as well.
Abbasi S, Ayoob T, Malik A, & Memon S. I. (2020). Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 9-36.
Al-Fahad F. N. (2010). The learners’ satisfaction toward e-learning e-learning implemented in the college of applied studies and community service, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia: Can e-learning replace the conventional system of education? Turkish E-learning Journal of Distance Education., 11(2), 61-72.
Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the united states. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234606148_Going_the_Distance_E-learning_Education_in_the_United_States_2011.
Berenson, R., Boyles, G., & Weaver, A. (2008). Emotional intelligence as a predictor for success in online learning. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9(2), 116.
Bowen, J. A. (2012). Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your college classroom will improve student learning. Jossey-Bass. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 1118238087, 9781118238080.
Cao, Y. & Sakchutchawan, S. (2011). Online vs. traditional MBA: an empirical study of students’ characteristics, course satisfaction, and overall success. Journal of Human Resources and Adult Learning, 79(2), 112.
Duraku Z.H & Hoxha L. (2020). The impact of COVID-19, school closure, and social isolation on gifted students’ wellbeing and attitudes toward remote (online) learning. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23967.38567/1.
Hampton, K. N., Fernandez, L., Robertson, C. T., & Bauer, J. M. (2020). Broadband and Student Performance Gaps, James H. and Mary B. Quello Center, Michigan State University. DOI: 10.25335/BZGY-3V91.
Hayashi, R., Garcia, M., Maddawin, A., & Hewagamage, K. P. (2020). online learning in Sri Lanka’s higher education institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic. ADB BRIEFS, 151.
Liaw S.S, Huang H.M, & Chen G.D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-80.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miller, M. D. (2016). Online learning: does it work? In minds online: Teaching effectively with technology. Harvard University Press, pp. 19-41.
Miliszewska, I. (2007). Is it fully ‘on’ or partly ‘off’? The case of fully-online provision of transnational education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 499–514.
Muilenburg, L. Y. & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 2948. DOI: 10.1080/01587910500081269.
Pourghaznein T, Sabeghi H, & Shariatinejad K. (2015). Effects of e-learning, lectures, and role playing on nursing students’ knowledge acquisition, retention, and satisfaction. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 29-162.
Rashid S. & Yadav S.S. (2020). Impact of covid-19 pandemic on higher education and research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 14(2), 340–343.
Sarah J Lewis, Alasdair P S Munro, George Davey Smith, & Allyson M Pollock. (2021). Closing schools is not evidence based and harms children: Keeping schools open should be the UK’s top priority. DOI: 10.1136/bmj. n521.
Siddesh Tari & Gautami Amonkar. (2021). Impact of Covid on Higher Education in India. Educational Resurgence Journal, 2(5), 22-27.
Song, L, Singleton, Ernise S., Janette R. Hill, & Myung-Hwa Koh. (2004). Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003.
Sriyalatha, M. A. K. & Kumarasinghe, P. J. (2021). Factors influencing online education during covid-19 pandemic: Sri Lankan students’ perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 11(4), 203-213. DOI: 10.31033/ijemr.11.4.25.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.